Stories

Featured Story

Our voice will be heard

7 year survivor....not only mammograms but if you have dense breast you need further testing. My Mammogram didn’t detect my cancer until I had other signs and had a biopsy of a dense area. I had 3 tumors all invasive by the time I was diagnosed. They said I probable was walking around for 2-3 years with my cancer.
The sooner you start to be tasted they can watch for any changes...earlier the better!
I have a friend's mom who was diagnosed with breast cancer, could've been avoided if tests where done earlier and closer together! Things need to change, peoples lives are on the line.
I was 38 and I felt something, a little “nub” in my left breast. I did self checking every so often but not regularly. I thought to myself, that’s weird, maybe it’s been there this whole time and I just never noticed it. I checked every couple of weeks, got my period in the meantime and for sure it was still there, not moving. So I made an appointment with my GP. He said yes, that seems new. Not alarming but let’s get it checked out. Long story short, got the full work up on both sides because I “was close to 40 anyway” ( their words, not mine) and luckily it came back as dense breast tissue (I forget the technical term for it!) my mom said she has the same, nothing to worry about.
Fast forward a year later, I’m 39 going in for my follow up.
Mammogram on both sides. Tech comes in to scan more on the right. Comes back says, the radiologist wants a ultrasound. He has time right now can you stay? Me, I’m like sure why not, probably just dense tissue again.
Ultrasound, biopsy and 24hours later, diagnosed with invasive ductile carcinoma. In my right breast.
Small.
Less than 7cm.
But still, if I had never gone in, before I was 40,
If I would’ve waited until I was 50, to find what at 40 was not even noticeable to a self exam... my story would have ended up a whole lot different than it is right now at almost 44.
How Are You Today?

My Name Is Ezra, and have been in the internet marketing industry

We found you on web 40not50.org and I truly liked your work.

This is a very simple internet traffic system, One-Click Traffic System

This Traffic Come From Facebook,Twitter , Linkedln , Social Media Etc... Everyday Can Use

--You Can Put You Website Keyword To Rank Search Engine
--All Work AUTO And Software Will Do The Work, Behind The Scene

https://bit.ly/2Kc9OEN

Get Instant Access And Jut Put You Link Choose The Different Traffic Source And Also Can Put In Keyword To Get Traffic.

You Will Know Everything, If Miss Will Dont Know What Is This Useful Forever

Best Regards
At 42 I had my first mammogram they found a benign tumor that I had removed immediately. I had routine mammograms every year except 2012. In 2013 I had my mammogram they found multiple lumps! it was determined to be HER2+ Stage 2 breast cancer. I did neoadjuvant chemo drug (Taxotere) and two antibody drugs (Herceptin and (Perjeta), when I completed the chemo cycle I had a lumpectomy and breast reduction followed by radiation. I am cancer free, but I still suffer with post chemo side effects. Very blessed but I wish the side effects would just go away.
Dawne L.
40 Not 50
Ashley A.
I believe early detection is the best defense against breast cancer. My sister who is only 2 years older then me, was diagnosed with breast cancer and fought for 3 years. Thanks to her i was able to find out that i have the BRACA 2 gene. I am able to get the mammograms needed to protect myself. I believe we need preventative health not an insurance company saying they dont want to pay for this. It is less expensive to prevent disease then to have to pay for treatment.
Being adopted I have no family history so starting at 40 was important.
Charlene
40 not 50! One of my best friends found out she had breast cancer at 44 during a routine mammogram.
Dawna L.
My aunt was diagnose with cancer at her 49 year old she is a survivor of cancer. Since that I have been concern the cancer may run on all our family, before my 40 I had my 1st mammogram so every year I do it, everyday I check may breast about 3 week ago I discover a lump on my left breast. I called my doctor and she send me for a ultrasound now she send me for a MRI since I had done my mammogram about 6 moths am very concern but whatever its my result I will fight against cancer. An early check up will save our life.
Elizabeth G.
As a stage 4 TNBC survivor, I have met many women who were diagnosed under the age of fifty...including my own cousin. I absolutely support Dr. West and his 40 over 50 campaign.
Erika P.
Please allow women to continue to have their mammograms at starting age 40 (if not earlier) there are so many survival cases when women get their mammos early. But because of the early detection, it is normally caught early enough
Debra W.
I was recently diagnosed with breast cancer, and thanks to 3D mammograms they were able to find it early and treat it. It came out of the blue, I'm healthy, I excercise, I'm not over weight - so it can happen to anyone. I've had mammograms since I was 40 and for every woman, it's peace of mind. My sister in law was diagnosed with breast cancer at 45, she found a lump. Perhaps if she had had a 3D mammogram at 40 they would have found it earlier. Thankfully she is doing well but I feel it's important to start as early as allowed for women under 50 since the cancers are much more aggressive pre-menopausal.
Cristina C.
Early detection is the key!!!! Screenings save lives
Melissa K.
I am 67 years old. On January 30, 2017, I had a simple mastectomy. I had seen 2 Dr.'s in December, an Internist and a Gynecological Oncologist who missed 2 masses in my right breast. My Internist ordered my annual mammogram which I had on Dec. 23rd. A mass was found and the biopsy found that I had Stage 1 invasive ductal carcinoma. We scheduled a lumpectomy, but my surgeon decided to get a breast MRI ahead of surgery. It showed another cancerous mass which then required that I have a mastectomy.
The pathology report following my surgery indicated that I had two different cancers and changed the Grade of both tumors from 1 to 2/3, or much more aggressive. When the radiologist reviewed my previous mammograms from one year ago, they found no indication of either mass. If I could not have gotten yearly mammograms, considering the aggressiveness of my cancers, they would have most likely metastasized to other parts of my body and I might not have survived.

If mammograms are restricted to those over 50 and only until age 76, and only every other year, we will lose many more woman to this awful disease. Mammography caught my cancer early! Let's not let our sisters down!
Carolyn S.
I was diagnosed with Stage 2 cancer at age 43. If my doctors had been more observant of the reports my cancer would have never reached a Stage 2 as I had early signs of calcification that were never checked. Had I waited until 50, I would have died before my first mammogram. My daughters need special care and consideration as they are considered high risk.
Margie K.
Mammogram detected mine at age 40. I would not be here today if I had waited until 50.
Carol l.
AS A OVARIAN CANCER SURVIOR I WONT TAKE ANY CHANCE ON MY LIFE FOR A BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSITIS SO I STARTED MY SCREENING MAMMO AT AGE 35
Elizabeth C.
I am a 30 year old student working part time. I am all for early detection. I have had many loved ones effected by this ugly disease. Some have survived some have gone on. Early dectection is very important. Earlier the better.
My friends and family is my story
I was diagnosed with Stage 2 triple negative breast cancer on 10/17/2011. I was 35 years old, mother to a 1 year old and a 3 year old. I found a lump on 9/10/2011, by accident – wiping excess baby lotion on my chest after I had over-poured it on David after his bath. I had been in for a yearly ob/gyn exam less than 3 months before this self discovery however no mammogram was done since I was under age 40, only a clinical exam which did not detect a lump at the time. I never did self exams. I thought of breast cancer as a disease for old ladies. And I had definitely never even heard of triple negative. Triple negative breast cancer is extremely aggressive - my tumor grew from 2cm to just under 5cm with lymphovascular invasion in less than 6, yes SIX, weeks. Breast cancer is not just a single form of cancer, there are subtypes of it. These subtypes of breast cancer are diagnosed based upon the presence, or lack of, three receptors known to fuel the majority of breast cancers: estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). The most successful treatments for breast cancer target these receptors. These receptors are not found in triple negative breast cancer, meaning the tumor is ER negative, PR negative and HER2 negative, hence the name triple negative, and also meaning that there is NO targeted treatment for triple negative. I am currently in remission as of 7/24/2012, after a double mastectomy, removal of 6 lymph nodes, 16 rounds of chemotherapy, 33 rounds of radiation, port surgery, 3 reconstructive surgeries and most of all...numerous answered prayers.
I got srage 4 breast cancer. I was 42 at the time. I found it myself.
My grandma passed due to breast cancer. This is my biggest fear. I have a 5 year old and I would do anything to spend more time with him..
I know several women that have developed breast cancer before the age of 40 and one of them was diagnosed stage 2 when discovered from her mammogram at age 40. Had it not been detected then, it may have been too late.
I am a breast cancer survivor of over 18 years. I was diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer at 42 years of age. Through early screening and careful monitoring I had surgery followed by chemo and radiation. I had two young children at the time and through early detection I am still here to tell my story!
I have had several friends developing breast cancer in their 30s.
My breast cancer was found BY MAMMOGRAM when I was 42. The tumor was not palpable. If not for the “early” mammogram, I would not be alive today.
My breast cancer was discovered via routine mammogram at age 46 if I had waited till 50 -I cannot even imagine how much worse it would ha e been!
I have a dear friend who at age 45 went and got her annual exam. She was diagnosed with an aggressive form of breast cancer. She immediately underwent a double mastectomy, chemo, and eventually reconstructive surgery. She is living proof of the need for mammograms before age 50.
I was diagnosed with early stage 2 breast cancer in 12/17 at the age of 47. I underwent surgery for mastectomy of my left breast followed by radiation treatments due to one positive lymph node. I have no family history of breast cancer, never smoked, rarely drink and I live a very healthy lifestyle.
It was just one week after my mother passed away that I discovered a lump on the side of my right breast. My gut knew immediately that it was cancer, my heart and mind couldn’t deal with it so I promptly ignored it. I kept feeling a weird internal tickle at the site of the lump so after awhile I finally saw my doctor. Three months and one day after losing my mom to lung cancer I was diagnosed with breast cancer. I was only 43 years old. Thus started the whirlwind of doctor appointments, scans, blood work, ultrasounds, biopsies, and so on.
Throughout I kept hearing two things over and over....”You just lost your mom to cancer? I’m so sorry” and “You’re so young”. The combination seemed to create an oddness that even doctors and nurses had to acknowledge. The first time I saw the oncologist he tried to make a joke...”You know, we have a one per family rule around here”. Well I guess I’m a rebel then.
My tumor was large enough that a lumpectomy was not an option so on my 44th birthday, I had a double mastectomy and started reconstruction. I had three surgeries over 7 months. I had some setbacks during the healing process and ended up having to do physical therapy to get full range of motion in my arms again. I still have numbness across my chest and under my right arm.
After further testing the tumor I was officially diagnosed with Stage One Invasive Ductal Carcinoma. I was ER and PR positive, HER2 negative. With an Onco Type score of just 8 my oncologist decided chemo and radiation weren’t the best options for me. After watching what my mother went through, chemo was what scared me the most, so I consider myself very blessed that I didn’t have to do that. I started on Tamoxifen right after the mastectomy and was told I would take it for five years. My oncologist has since changed that and now wants me to take it for at least 10 years. I don’t care. I don’t have many side effects, other than hot flashes and I didn’t have to do chemo.
I started getting mammograms at 40 per the original guidance. I was not identified as high risk. Last year at 45, a routine mammogram detected stage 2 invasive ductal carcinoma. I completed radiation therapy at the beginning of this year, after my lumpectomy. I credit preventative screening with my current high quality of life and excellent prognosis.
Margot S.
I support mammograms starting at 40 NOT 50!
Jeanette M.
Early detection is the best protection!!!!
I have too many friends who have fought this deadly disease. 40 not 50 has saved their lives. I support early detection and ask the government to not give in to the insurance company lobbyists. Early detection saves lives.
Maddy
I support starting mammograms at the age of 40!!
Jennifer D.
I started having mammograms at the age of 40. Both my mother and grandmother passed from breast cancer. It is important to be screened annually for this disease as early detection would improve chances of treating cancer.
Vicki
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure!!
Courtney
My cousin was is alive because it was detected before it was too late.
Brigida
I have dense breast and recently had a mammogram and needed further modalities which were not covered by insurance. Crazy!
Gail